There was a brief dust-up this week about the possibility of a nationalized 5G network that prompted immediate outcry from the industry, trade groups and telecom regulators such as Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai — and some speculation that hey, maybe it isn’t a crazy idea?
I oppose any proposal for the federal government to build and operate a nationwide 5G network. The market, not the government, is best positioned to drive innovation and investment. https://t.co/viIDB4mb0f pic.twitter.com/hgxRLtwoU4
— Ajit Pai (@AjitPaiFCC) January 29, 2018
Should Trump nationalize the 5G network? @superwuster thinks he'd do it the wrong way. But done right, it could be a great idea. https://t.co/04zwmwwsDM
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) February 1, 2018
No, it is a lousy idea for the current times – Should Trump Nationalize a 5G Network? https://t.co/zLvNPgbWWc
— chetansharma (@chetansharma) February 1, 2018
But what if the government did build a nationalized 5G network? Pros and cons https://t.co/UJrIckNsl0 pic.twitter.com/2KvHoFuEyF
— Technical.ly (@Technical_ly) February 1, 2018
This appears to be yet another flash in the Trump-news pan, but it’s an interesting illustration of how concerned the government is about the role of China in technology development and how that might impact national security. I don’t think it will ever make it into an actual proposal beyond what was leaked, or that any such proposal would have a chance of actually coming to fruition — the government has had enough issues getting people on board for FirstNet, although the agency and AT&T ultimately pulled off unanimous opt-in. Trying to concoct some sort of nationalized 5G network seems like a technical, logistical and financial nightmare that the government is unlikely to actually take on (particularly if it might compete with commercial carriers) even if it continues to be worried about the role of Chinese technology and technology companies.
ICYM this week’s quarterly results from the Big Four, telecom analysts are hitting some of the high points:
Q4 Post-paid phone net adds $TMUS 891k $VZ 431k $T 286k $CMCSA 187k $S 184k
— Walt Piecyk (@WaltBTIG) February 2, 2018
Annual subscriber growth from the Big 4. $T $VZ $$TMUS $S pic.twitter.com/8Jq3Sbj6Zw
— Walt Piecyk (@WaltBTIG) February 2, 2018
#Sprint Prepaid turned the corner in '17 from a net loser to net gainer w/373K adds. $S
Prepaid now ~22% (~9M subs) of its retail connections up from ~21 YoY.@boostmobile main contributor. @virginmobileusa still waiting for that game changing contribution. $S pic.twitter.com/lunCrXPgAi— Bill Ho (@billho888) February 2, 2018
Sprint is talking up its plans for 5G in 2019 with massive multiple-input-multiple-output as its gateway technology. Will we finally see significant 2.5 GHz utilization?? Sprint has been talking about the value of that for a loooooong time, and I’ve heard speculation from time to time that at least in theory, that spectrum trove + wireless backhaul means that Sprint could leapfrog other networks’ capabilities with faster deployment and lower costs. But of course, the devil is in actually being able to make that possibility a reality. Sprint seems to be pulling off improvements on customer numbers, maybe executing on their network isn’t as far-fetched a concept?
The @Sprint Next-Gen Network will bring #5G blazing fast speeds, low latency, & multi Gbps for both download & upload. 3QFY17 $S pic.twitter.com/vlcIGa22PF
— MarceloClaure (@marceloclaure) February 2, 2018
Our #5G network will not be limited to millimetric hotzones or the use of “pucks”. $S @Sprint https://t.co/yxeiw1hR8e
— John Saw (@SprintCTO) February 2, 2018
That “puck” reference, by the way, is a dig at AT&T’s comments that it expects the first 5G devices that it deploys to be “pucks” that are basically personal mobile hot spots. Presumably that support devices via Wi-Fi, much like the customer premise equipment for fixed wireless access 5G, so that devices which don’t support mmwave and/or 5G NR have a way to use the network.
Meanwhile, Verizon and T-Mobile US were racing to be first this week on narrowband IoT tests, laying the groundwork for nationwide deployment of the technology in guard bands.
Yesterday the team successfully tested Narrowband IoT in guard bands in the lab, and this morning they completed the first data message in the field – 2 U.S. firsts from @TMobile in 24 hours! pic.twitter.com/545ydPC53c
— Neville (@NevilleRay) February 1, 2018
HOT NERD NEWS from @verizon – Verizon carries successful data session on new NB-IoT Guard band network with partner @ericsson in Westlake, Texas . @H20_hwaterman @HansVestberg_ https://t.co/HYlV7VTITh
— Jeffrey Nelson (@JNels) February 1, 2018
Verizon says that it will have a national NB-IOT guard band network deployment across its network this year.
As we enter Super Bowl weekend, my favorite hashtag is #SuperbOwls. Watch out for the shift key, it changes everything.
Minnesota is the place to be for the Super Bowl and superb owls https://t.co/KNGONNQNgb
— MPR News (@MPRnews) February 1, 2018
Also, this:
Watch #Jeopardy contestants have absolutely no clue about football https://t.co/SuJ2Xv36ub
— Entertainment Weekly (@EW) February 2, 2018
The post Telecom Tweets of the Week: Floating the idea of nationalized 5G appeared first on RCR Wireless News.